Off-beat perceptions and life tips of the world and all its players.
Keep it clean, keep it honest and as a great friend told me, keep swimming!
Posting articles here is my hobby. No advertisements on this page, although linked pages may have some. No copyright infringement intended.
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Scaling We: A Journey of Heart-Centered Deliberation
Traci Ruble is a psychotherapist and the founder of an extremely successful
community listening project Sidewalk Talk. One day, in the fall of 2015, Traci
and 27 other listeners took their therapists chairs out into the streets of
San Francisco, offering the gift of listening to anyone who wanted it. There
seems to have been a huge need for that offering of sympathetic,
non-judgmental attention, and for being witnessed.
Traci's initiative has resonated with so many people that it has turned into a
global movement. Since the launch of the project, thousands of volunteers have
been trained who sit on sidewalks and listen to strangers. They listen
as equals, equipped with skills to intervene in a crisis, and are supported by
a background-checked leader. All over the world, Traci and the Sidewalk Talk
volunteers seek to create communities of listeners who return to the same
public spaces to practice heart-centered listening. Their mission is to create
public spaces of connection and belonging. Listening to people’s stories, they
seek to offer an antidote to the current tide of loneliness, fragmentation and
disconnection.
Traci talked to Anna Katharina Schaffner.
Anna: Traci, one of the many reasons I am really excited about
interviewing you for Emerge is that you have managed to bridge this perceived
gap between inner work and socially transformative activism so powerfully in
your Sidewalk Talk initiative. Can you tell us a bit more about Sidewalk Talk?
What gave you the idea to take psychoanalytical listening out into the streets?
And how does it help build community?
Traci: Thanks for seeing me and giving me the space to
share more and explore more deeply. At the root of Sidewalk Talk was not
“my idea” but something that came through me. Some years ago, I had a
bizarre spiritual experience in my therapist’s office. It freaked me out. I
was not a seeker of mystical spiritual experiences. It happened to me quite
accidentally. A big fireball of love took over my body and I spoke from that
love the entire session. In that office I met my essential self: a self
connected to all beings. I tapped into a very intense universal love. When I
opened my eyes, my therapist had tears streaming down her face. She said to me
through her tear-streaked face “There is no charge for session today”. Fast
forward to today, I am doing some deep Jungian archetypal work. I am probably
due to sit with that experience again.
In 2014 I was
therefore primed for the dream that I had and that invoked Sidewalk Talk. My
dream was about fitting my therapist’s chair in an elevator and putting it on
a sidewalk. At the same time, I was moved by Marina Abramovic’s “The Artist Is
Present” and Jan Gehl’s urban design work on how we use public spaces to allow
for our humanity to come through.
Coinciding with this dream
we had incident after incident of mass shootings and police murdering Black
and Brown folks in the US. I was lost. Confused. Heart-broken. But also
annoyed by the “woke Olympics” a lot of my white colleagues were engaged in.
To me, that stuff is white shame or white supremacy in social justice drag. I
wanted to get my body out there on the street and quit hanging out in the
ivory tower of my therapy office and my psychological theory. I don’t know
whether I was taking psychoanalytic listening out to the street. I was maybe
unconsciously protesting ALL theories and advocating for our humanity and
healing with curiosity rather than preaching anything. And then there was the
very personal lonely and unwanted part of me I was reclaiming. Oddly, sitting
out on the sidewalk has led me to question some elements of psychotherapy more
deeply than ever.
Anna: Do you think that people are lonelier now than they
have been in the past? As a cultural historian, I tend to be a little
suspicious about the idea that we are experiencing emotions and mental states
more intensely or at a completely unprecedented degree of intensity compared
to our ancestors. But at the same time, very dramatic and fast-paced social
and technological transformations have taken place in the last decades, and I
am sure they have impacted on our inner lives, too. What is your impression,
out there on the sidewalk, and also in your practice more generally?
Traci: I don’t know whether we are lonelier now compared to
the past. There is actually contradicting science. I believe it is getting
more attention because
Julianne Holt-Lunstad’s
research shows there are real healthcare costs associated with loneliness. It
makes us physically and mentally sick. The mental health crisis is amassing
huge costs for industrialized nations and that makes us pay more attention.
Loneliness is expensive.
So while I don’t know if we are lonelier than in the past, I do know there are
new causes for our loneliness that are totally novel to our current time. We
have always been busy. While we feel busy now, I cannot imagine running a farm
or working 16 hours a day in a factory felt “less busy”.
Faye Bound Alberti, in your
neck of the woods, came on the
Sidewalk Talk podcast. She
studies the history of emotions and medicine. She discussed changes in the way
we relate to our bodies as machines. Fixing our machines through medicine
stripped our connection to soulfulness and even a perceived sense of meaning
from our lives. That is a new cause of loneliness.
A hero of mine,
Niobe Way, talks
about how mental health, as we define it, is based on stoic
hyper-individualistic intellectualism. Our therapeutic manual that tells us if
someone is sick is based on the ideal temperament for a white male. And to be
tender towards men, this was based on the ideal temperament of a certain class
of white male worker. We may be valorizing stoicism, productivity,
intellectualism and individualism but these are the very things that can make
us lonely if that is all that we are.
Finally, connecting over technology allows us to get further away from our
bodies, from the earth, and from each other. You just can’t create any tech
app, VR or AI to have the magic of the human soul. Never. And I really really
like technology. I’m not a luddite. I used to sell software. Thank God for
Zoom during this pandemic but give me a face to face meeting any day. I love
tech and simultaneously I have some shadowy aggression towards it these days.
Anna: Is your sense that we have lost the knack for the art
of connecting? Has our capacity to relate to others diminished in the past
decades? If so, why might this be the case?
Traci: For me to answer this question I would have to have
the audacity to believe I can speak for all people. I am an upper-class white
woman from the Silicon Valley. You want to know who knows how to
connect, and who I have met. Seriously? The weirdos, the misfits, and
the marginalized. I have learned more about generosity from folks living on
the streets. I have learned more about curiosity from artists. I have learned
more about having someone’s back ferociously and consistently from my Black
friends. What I do bear witness to from my limited perspective and from the
folks I learn from, like you, Niobe, Faye and others, is that we are now
baking disconnection into the very systems we live, work and play in.
If you don’t give parents parental leave how are they connecting with their
children? If healthcare is so expensive you are living your life terrified or
bubble-wrapped because you don’t want to get sick, you are in protection mode.
Protection mode limits our ability to be in connection mode. And ask my
sons. They are quite smart and smart-assed little kids. But they are smart
enough to see that the schools they have attended are more interested in
socializing them rather than truly equipping them to connect.
Anna: Truly listening is an art form. It entails staying in
the present and letting go of our solutionist, fixer-mindset. How do you
counteract this impulse?
Traci: Ah delicious. I have fallen in love with listening.
First to all those reading who may roll their eyes I want to raise my hand and
say “I suck at listening and I love fixing too.” How could I not? Everything I
learned from church, school, the economy, and the culture in which I was
raised taught me to treat myself and people as fixable objects, sinners who
must atone, or machines that must achieve and do.
Now I am going to be a little vulnerable. After I got over my need to
fix, the personal thing I had to work on to get better at listening is letting
go of my need to be liked. I had to learn to love myself so honestly and
profoundly, that the part of me that needs to be liked is not the one doing
the listening. Why? Because that is about me, not the other person.
So I have a little trick… I like to make things easy and non-pretentious.
Ready for my listening trick? It is quite simply to delight. Spend your entire
time being with another person as an exercise in delighting in their humanity
in as many ways as you possibly can. Don’t worry about getting active
listening right. So I counteract the fixing impulse and the need to be
liked stuff with the act of delighting.
Anna: What is the most precious thing listening on the
sidewalk has taught you?
Traci: People are really really good. I mean so good.
They are beautiful and wonderful and magical and lovely. And when we hold
space for someone with delight in our eyes, guess what? We call forward
the lovely in one another.
A man I listened to some years back I think of most often. He is a man
who sat on a park bench near our chairs as we were packing up for the day. He
easily had ten other benches he could have chosen. So as I was packing up I
walked by and said “How is your day going?”
He said, “It could be better.”
I scooted in right next to him on the park bench, my shoulder touching his
shoulder and I smiled and said “Do you want to talk about it?”
He shared with me he was on parole. He shared what it was like to be a
Black man in America. He shared with me how hard it is in the area he
lives to not get caught up in drugs. I felt no white saviorism. My listening
was different that day. Partly because I had heard so many folks. Partly
because some you just like more than others. He and I had an easy rapport. My
heart was really still and quiet.
He went on for ten minutes. And all I heard as I heard this man was how
good and honorable he was.
So I told him. I said, “Gosh as I hear your story what I hear is what a good
man you are.”
He began to cry. His chest heaving, he let me enfold him in my arms. When we
came apart, I had his tears all over my shirt. And then that thing happens,
the act of taking delight in others. What poured out of this guy was his
vision for his life beyond being a Black man in America. He was him in all his
glory. All his hope, his dreams, his promise came forward. And I know it came
forward not because I helped him but because of how I chose to show up as an
equal.
Some days I still wish I could call him on the phone. As it was time for me to
head to the airport I said to him, “Hey, I have a question for you.”
“Sure Traci, what is it?” he said.
“If you ever see me sitting on a park bench needing someone to listen, will
you come sit with me and listen for awhile?”
We both were silent. We just looked at each other. And he said slowly, and
steadily, “Absolutely, Traci. Absolutely.”
I never saw him again. And maybe that conversation meant absolutely nothing to
him. But it meant everything to me and he changed me.
Anna: You used to work in tech in Silicon Valley. But then
you became a psychotherapist. What made you choose that path?
Traci: I had spent 7 years in my own therapy. My mother was a
teen mom who tried to abort me. When I got in trouble as a kid she would say
things like “Traci, you are lucky you are alive.” Sounds horrible, I know, but
I know parents get pushed to the edge. She was also married six times and
that, I think, screwed up my perspective more than “not being wanted”. I was
special and connected to her until she had a new man, and then, like an old
shoe, I was tossed aside for a few years. Mental Health treatment wanted me to
be stoic, rational, and suck it up. And I did, until I couldn’t. Hustling for
wealth was a turn-off. It felt soulless to me. So I left not because I hated
tech. I left to reclaim my soul somehow.
Anna: What kind of therapy do you practice?
Traci: Hah. Changing all the time. At the root I define
myself as a feminist therapist. What that means is we are co-creating in the
room. My work is not about wanting you to be “healthy” according to the DSM
but wanting you to be healthy according to YOU. My spiel to clients is there
are four legs to the healing stool: thinking, the body, our relating patterns,
and the context all of that is happening in. That context includes injustice,
current policies, social norms, income, the unconscious, and our relationship
as client and therapist. I am not the perfect reparent. I am a flawed human
with you who is wise as fuck, who can own my mistakes, so people feel so damn
safe with me they are able to go places they just can’t quite outside our
work. And eventually they do. Anna, that is the realest answer I have ever
given.
Anna: I’d be really interested to hear a bit more about
your relationship to human darkness, our shadows. In one of your interviews
you referred to yourself as a “bottom dweller.” I was really intrigued by
that. How does that shape your practice and your relationships?
Traci: For me, because of my religious upbringing, I want to
get off my floating cloud and really feel all the feelings. I just had a
conversation today with a young woman and she said “I don’t like to hang out
in negative emotions.” I don’t call emotions negative or positive in that way.
They are all messengers and I happen to like the muddier, murkier emotions
that are less “Leave It To Beaver” and more “American Horror Story” with the
intent of not being morbid but being real.
Anna: What can Emerge learn from Sidewalk Talk? One of the
most central questions we are grappling with is how we can become a bigger,
more cohesive kind of “we.” We often talk unthinkingly about “we” in social
change circles. But it is in lots of ways a problematic word, we just assume
it exists as a meaningful unit of agency. Who is this “we” we are talking
about? How can we cohere at scale?
Traci: Scaling community is masterful work and I am in
awe of people who can do it. I know, for me, I felt like I, alone, had to do
the holding of the “we”. I also didn’t know how to cope when people would join
that felt like they were disruptive to the “we” or doing a lot of acting out
with “me”.
I used to have an eye roll about mission statements and values but now I see
their point. We know people are more drawn to overlook their differences and
work together when they know what they are working toward. And the values
define the feeling of the metaphorical house and garden we are operating our
organization from. Once those values and the mission are clear, you can have
many community builders you give a lot of permission to bring their own genius
to the house and garden. My favourite thing is to build enough of a
structure where I trust you, you trust me, and then I watch what you create.
90% of the chapter leaders here at Sidewalk Talk are better community
organizers than me. They are just brilliant, so I learn from them. What I
bring to them is courage. They may have brilliant ideas and I give the courage
to launch.
For me, early days, I held too tightly onto things because I didn’t know how
to embody my values or even feel entitled to what I value and build that into
this project. Sometimes I held too tightly onto pleasing others and wore
myself out and then I was the disruptive entity. I have a lot of
tender-heartedness that I was casting into the shadow and I didn’t know how to
incorporate tender-heartedness into an operational structure in a way that
didn’t have me “over-giving” on one extreme or being “too rigid” on the other.
Scaling “we” takes heart-centred deliberation. It takes a clearly defined set
of values you live by while on your mission together. And it takes the
capacity to ensure that the model sustains the well-being of all involved so
no one burns out because burnout leads to disconnection.